I spoke to one parent in a recent tournament Kiera had participated
in. We shared various topics including club trainings which he emphasised to
explore various academies instead of reliant on one. The old adage came to mind,
“familiarity breeds contempt…” I had been an advocate of this since my boys were
playing competitively in their junior days. I try to observe that they dont fall too deep in their comfort zone. To give them fresh perspective in
training, they always have training diversity with variety of coaches at different
academies.
He continued to share, as a player develops further to
higher levels, trainings should be complimented with regular sparring and
competitions to actualise what they have trained. Some don’t see it that way
but he seemed to be a firm believer of this and opined that the mentality of a player
during training is different than when they are in a match with a stake at
hand. When there is a small wager to spice up the match and usually this will bring
up the intensity and quality of the match than they normally would during
training. Tournaments with cash winnings often spur players into competitive
mentality and precisely the reason why I wanted Kiera to participate in private
tournaments periodically.
Its not so much for the cash winnings although it is nice to have, instead it
is part of her training process or a check point if you will, to gauge where about
she has progressed in the field of competition. Whenever there is a good
challenge (win or lose), I would record it on video and analyse it. Her
shortcomings will be highlighted and brought to the attention of her coaches to
address specific areas in her game that needed correction and improvements.
Secondly, the private tournaments were intended as a
precursor, preparation and readiness before a major tournament. It is akin to a
trial exam as it were, a rehearsal and familiarization of the actual tournament. This run-in was intended to get her used to competition mode. Its a mental thingy to build her confidence and hopefully assist to overcome her anxieties, fears and doubts as the
tournament days draws near.
Therefore, the result of these private tournaments may be
secondary. Instead, the focus is to build up her form and peak her at the right
time, or at least an attempt to this effect. Therefore, at times she has to
learn to accept her losses first so as this could induce her to reset herself
in the next coming tournament psychologically and make a comeback. What we
certainly do not want is to peak too early and her form goes downhill from here.
For the third part, I have conceptualize a typical players’
performance progression in a graph below.
This graph depicts a progression of performance over time, represented by the blue curve line. As long as a player trains consistently over time (without interruption of injury or long layoffs), the player’s performance progression should develop in the way of the blue line. I have identified three levels of relative progression as represented by three rectangular boxes ie. elementary, intermediate and advance levels respectively. In each of the levels, a player’s actual performance will experience ups and downs as I call it “Range of Performance” and the range should oscillate along the blue line.
There is a possibility of overlap in each range of performance too, but for illustration purposes here, a player with a distinct level of performance should not deviate too much from the respective rectangular boxes. It is therefore imperative for a player/coach/manager to understand how to manage a player’s form within the respective rectangle and to work the player close to the blue line if not higher during tournament periods.
The other part which is equally important succeeding to this
is to plan a players’s yearly calendar using the concept of periodization. That
will be in another article (if I can find the time to write again.)